Friday, April 24, 2015
Weekend Discussion: Misogyny and Sexism Need an Executioner
I'm in step with those who are watching Amores Con Trampa but still catching up to La Sombra del Pasado (cap 25) and Que Te Perdone Dios (cap 34), but the sexism is getting to me. I totally get that rural environments are often more sexist than urban ones and what's going on in ACT makes a certain amount of sense. However in the 21st century are the other two even close to reality anymore?
The disgustingly outdated pueblo-chico-infierno-grande notion that Aldonza (named for the slut in Man of La Mancha; no coincidence) is a clone of her sick and slutty mother in LSDP and the sadism of Fausto in QTPD and Severiano in LSDP are really over the top. When Severiano raped Aldonza in the early episodes and tried to do so again in episode 22 I was almost screaming. I am still wondering how Candela will react to this when/if she finds out, but she's such a cold fish it wouldn't surprise me if she just shrugged it off.
Which is much easier to understand than the attitudes in QTPD. For once, the Mejia predecessor (Abrazame Muy Fuerte) to this one made a lot more sense from both a writing and casting perspective. Fausto is Federico on steroids with his evil; he doesn't even have the superficial charm that would theoretically attract the women who have pursued him. The fact that Sergio Goyri and Cesar Evora are the same age off-camera is a contributing factor to this, since 16 years have passed between these two series. However, it made no sense for Bruno to punish Renata by forcing her to marry Fausto, which was the total opposite of Severiano in AMF trying to protect Christina from Federico's greed... and his gambling problem. It was as though Bruno didn't give a flying damn that he was putting his widow and daughter in harm's way by putting them under Fausto's control. I didn't buy his apology to Renata in his dying words.
At least Simoneta won the election. But I suspect more foul play is in the making.
In both of these stories women are being punished for merely existing. When the hell will this stop?
Sorry if this sounds like a rant, but although I know that the originals of these stories were written decades ago, new versions should be re-examining this stuff and updating it better.
Sound off, my friends.
Labels: que-te, sombra, telenovelas, weekend
I tried QTPD for one week and couldn't stand it. I've lurked in the comments and read that there have been 3 rapes. Seriously? Crazy.
Exactly! With the more subtle details as well, like how few women are cast in the smaller roles when it's a position of authority. Am I meant to believe that there are NO women police officers, doctors, lawyers, judges? The only time one shows up its when she's there to be a love interest.
Y ya basta with the protagonista getting a degree...and then spending the rest of the show doing NOTHING with it and basically doing nothing at all except pursuing a galan who's busy treating her like dirt.
I can't say the same for Sombra. Although the rape has yet to be punished, we have seen and felt the effects on the heroine and her mother and aunt, and the rape remains very present as a ticking time bomb if revealed. (Unlike in Perdone.) The writers don't seem to have the same love for Severiano, as the writers in Perdone have for Fausto. You can tell they are as eager to see Sever fail and be exposed as we are. I also don't feel like the writers have such a lack of respect for the women and their intelligence as they do in Perdone.
The "period" telenovelas are easier for me to watch because times were different and it is easier for me to swallow the sexism, etc. because times were different, women were more oppressed, and I don't have to suspend disbelief quite as often.
I couldn't keep with QTPD because Fausto has raped Renata several times and, though she is now middle-aged and supposed to be smart, she still falls for his cons. If Renata were out for revenge and on to Fausto's lies, I probably would be watching. And all the chicks want him -- please.
Hanna
Carlos Manuel (Mateo) in that story was unaware of Debora Falcon's duplicity but that was because she followed him out of the country and there wasn't a stew of hot bubbling gossip around that he closed his mind to.
Got a long list of comparisons of those two and I'm not even caught up to you guys.
The main question, I believe, is - Are these themes of machismo presented in a positive, accepting light or a negative, disapproving one?
Denise
BTW, in AMF the Simona character dropped out of the election after the murder of her son, who was a child in that version. Federico became mayor. His hit man was not a major supporting character in the same way that Lucio is in QTPD and it was a struggle for me to remember the character's name. Lucio's troubled conscience (or what's left of one) is more interesting and probably was written not just to accommodate the talents of this actor but to help fill more capitulos (AMF was only 136 episodes long).
I am losing respect for Liliana Abud -- who was also on the AMF writing team -- over the illogical prologue to this story. The casting director was also not at the top of his/her game in casting Sergio Goyri if we are truly meant to believe that any woman would find Fausto desirable. He would have been back when AMF was produced, but his smoking has kept him from aging well.
However, if we are meant to think Macaria is seriously demented then Sabine Moussier was the perfect choice for this role.
No casting errors in LSDP that I've found yet.
but I have a real problem w/the sexism & misogyny in Tierra de Reys
The most infuriating part of the sexism in this show is that the most guilty characters are women! Whether its a female character saying that she has to have a man running the ranch that *she* owns because no one will respect a woman in that position, or one of the younger female characters acting like they think of themselves as property, it is driving me nuts.
I think its as bad and damaging as the more obvious types of misogyny like violence against women which this show also has and hasn't resolved yet. (I'm still hoping)
This show is set in 21st century Houston fer gosh sakes
But it is really nice to see a higher quality show that allows for more variety in relationships, and gets that women are more than just baby-makers and maids. Even housewives home with kids deserve more respect from their husbands than these shows imply they are owed.
Kelly
I don't think the overkill of these subjects is totally realistic.
Seems more like the times years and years ago when I lived in Mexico, and even way back then, women were making progress.
And I don't agree that Televisa is portraying these subjects for other audiences.
I wish we had a Latina woman, or more, comment on the realism of these topics.
Cayatana wants Leonardo running the ranch because she's got the hots for him. It's not that she or Andrea don't have the ability to run the ranch. She wants Leonardo around for herself, otherwise she should have kicked his butt to the curb when Sofia divorced him.
What concerns me most about TdR is the classism. None of the employees stand up for themselves and they allow their employers to call them peons. This may be what happens in Mexico, but this show is supposed to take place in the US. No self-respecting American would ever put up with that crap.
I bailed on Amores Con Trampa, though promoted as comedic, but cannot stomach the disrespect Facundo shows his wife and mother of his children and while surfing in last night saw it hasn't changed. Almost as distasteful is her acquiescence after a browbeating.
I see these things in real life all too frequently, the grabby entitled male, the glee a male child brings over a female, the apologetic parents of the ner-do-well boy a product of their own and the community's excuses. Makes me want to vomit when under the surface the women run the businesses, hold the money, feed the people and the protector of face.
Here in the U.S., many religions promote the man being head of the household and leader of the family. You don't see women holding leadership positions in those religions either, which really irks me. I had to laugh (inside) when a coworker claimed that her husband was the head of the household, although she was the one holding down a job and paying the bills.
The smaller towns vary, which is why Televisa likes to use them, since they can appeal to the thought that such kind of place would have those views. With my current job I've been able to travel a little bit here and have visited some towns in which time goes slower than usual, where there's no internet, no phone signal and sometimes even no radio signal. The life in those towns is different, there are community leaders instead of mayors and women are not allowed to participate in assemblies, they aren't allowed to study beyond primary school and, sometimes, they are seen as commodities. The thing with Televisa shows is that these towns are usually very different in how they look than the towns they depict on tv. These towns look forgotten, alone, the houses are sometimes dispersed, the access is difficult and the population is usually small and decreasing.
Televisa likes to use beautiful towns that are much more city like, with beautiful locations but where they'd be able to find a hotel for their actors, electricity for their equipments and beautiful colonial buildings for their scenery. In these kinds of towns women would be able to find some positions of power, being a single mother wouldn't be as much of an issue and, while there'd be conservative ideas, being a woman wouldn't represent living badly. Sure there will be people who'd think women are worth less but I think the depiction would have to depend on the age of the characters, their economic position and their level of education. Younger generations would have new ideas and those who are able to travel or who enjoyed a good education wouldn't see women that way.
That said, I don't think that we have achieved full equality yet between the genders, not just in Mexico, but in the world in general, even in some advanced economies. So I do think there are certain elements of sexism even in the cities, like the access to positions of power, the wage gap and the general view of women's actions when compared to those of men.
Jarocha
Jarocha is right we haven't achieved anything near equality which is frustrating to me. I also find it so strange that novelas show so little respect for women when there are at least three South American countries with female presidents something that has never happen in the US.
I'd agree w/you about Cayetana just wanting Leo there 'cause she wants him, except there was this whole plot where Leo was sabotaging Andrea when she was running the place and Cayetana actually told her daughter that they needed a man to run the place 'cause no-one would respect or work w/a woman.
As for college age girls, if everything they see on tv and elsewhere is reinforcing that feminism is just from the waist down, how are they supposed to know better?
To this day nobody has explained why Santuzza was excommunicated. If it was for fornication or pregnancy out of wedlock, why wasn't Turridu excommunicated as well, since everybody in that town knows everybody else's business?
Doesn't that feel like these novelas?
BTW, if you can get to the encore presentation of this (on Wednesday in most places) do so. It's fantastic!
The overt misogyny and sexism is bad. I'm not denying that, but the subtle sexism of taking the time to show a prota getting a degree and then just going after the boy and walking down the aisle is somehow worse for me.
But for the love don't ask me to articulate why I feel this way. Lol.
I have to say, not all novelas are like this. In Cadena 3 the female leads are usually career driven, but those aren't being exported. It's interesting how that network makes choices that appeal to its audience but who knows if they would to a wider audience. A big appeal of Televisa's telenovelas are their familiarity and their tradidional values make them an easier sell around the world.
Jarocha
1. Anita does the Quiero Amarte page. Not just "anybody."
2. It's standard courtesy here to NEVER ask about recaps and when they are coming up.
3. This has NOTHING to do with Urban Anthropologist's post. If you want to know when the Quiero Amarte post is going up, ask over there.
After reading her perspective I was totally convinced that college is an asset no matter whether you use it in a career or as a mother.
Why not for once show the realistic side of getting a degree? Show me a lead that comes from a low income home, who's family tries to send her money each month, who lives in a "pensión para señoritas" with other female college students, who works half time to pay for her living expenses because the money sent from home is not enough and who goes to public school with other kids her age and who's main struggles after finnishing is finding a job that corresponds to her degree because the job market is tough and not much networking can be done in a public University from a heavily classist country.
Jarocha
Thanks for the heads up and thanks for posting the news here, because I don't know how anyone would know how or where to go on the Sidebar.
I think a good many viewers really liked YNCELH, so I will definitely watch that one, but need convincing to watch ECDLP.
The writers seem to love filming 50 Shades of Fausto I suppose.
One of the most frustrating stories in QPD to watch is the Marc and Violeta story , it seems women are not appropriate for politics and stuff in the show.
I like La Sombra much more, it has sexism but there is much more effect there. Atleast there is some degree of respect for women there cause Ald can also give her enemies Hell! Lisset as Adelina is also freaking amazing ,she plays mercy on no one but still plays the perfect supporting element for our heroes.
I never watched Amor Real but i suppose his evil predecessor was more interesting to watch on screen
<< Home
© Caray, Caray! 2006-2022. Duplication of this material for use on any other site is strictly prohibited.